Optometry 360
  • Home
  • Conferences
  • Videos
  • About Us
    • About Us – Mission
    • Media Partners
    • Advisory Board
    • Industry Council
    • Business Team

What are you looking for?

  • Conference Roundup
  • Contact Lenses
  • Diagnostics
  • Glaucoma
  • Myopia
  • Neurotrophic Keratitis
  • Ocular Surface Disease
  • Pediatrics
  • Practice Management
  • Presbyopia
  • Retina
  • Spotlight Series
The evolving role of the optometrist in nonsurgical cataract management
Optometry 360
  • Home
  • Conferences
  • Videos
  • About Us
    • About Us – Mission
    • Media Partners
    • Advisory Board
    • Industry Council
    • Business Team
Home > Dissatisfaction rates with presbyopia-correcting IOLs tied to specific risk factors
  • Presbyopia

Dissatisfaction rates with presbyopia-correcting IOLs tied to specific risk factors

Kelsey Moroz

Dissatisfaction with presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs) varies based on lens type and patient-specific factors, according to a study. Preoperative myopia is the main risk factor for near-vision discomfort, while thinner corneas and greater corneal astigmatism contribute to photic disturbances.

Researchers analyzed data from 340 eyes of 211 patients implanted with bifocal (ReSTOR), trifocal (PanOptix), or extended depth-of-focus (EDOF; Symfony) IOLs.

The overall dissatisfaction rate was 18.5%, with Symfony lenses showing the highest near-vision dissatisfaction. PanOptix lenses had comparable rates of photic disturbances and near-vision discomfort. The primary risk factor for dissatisfaction across all IOL types was preoperative myopia, which correlated with near-vision discomfort. Meanwhile, thinner corneal thickness and greater corneal astigmatism were linked to photic disturbances, particularly in PanOptix eyes.

Reference
Jeon W, Yoon CH, Oh JY, et al. Risk factors in self-reported dissatisfied patients implanted with various presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses after cataract surgery. BMC Ophthalmol. 2025;25(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-03912-4. PMID: 39972278; PMCID: PMC11837369.

Share

Related Content

  • Presbyopia

Smartphone reading habits differ between presbyopic and non-presbyopic adults

  • Presbyopia

Spotlight on TECNIS Odyssey™

  • Presbyopia

Drinking habit associated with faster progression of presbyopia in adults

  • Presbyopia

From readers to topical pharmaceuticals: a new dawn in presbyopia care

  • Presbyopia

Modeling and clinical data align on optimal pupil size for presbyopia therapy

  • Contact Lenses

Women in midlife show larger differences between preferred and full refractive correction

Share

Advisory Board

Kaleb Abbott, OD, MS, FAAO

Clark Chang, OD

Jessica Haynes, OD, FAAO, FORS, Dipl ABO

Monica Kalia, OD

Cecelia Koetting, OD, FAAO, DipABO

Roya Attar, OD, MBA, DHA, FAAO

Hardeep Kataria, OD, FAAO

Marc R. Bloomenstein, OD, FAAO

Elise Kramer, OD

See All
Optometry 360

Optometry 360® is a dynamic digital platform dedicated to advancing the field of eye care.

Get to Know Us

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Media Partners
  • Advertising Policy
  • Our Advisory Board

Sign up for our Newsletter

Sign up for our Newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
IHM Logo

© 2026 Optometry 360 is a trademark of International Healthcare Media, LLC. All rights Reserved

  • MedJournal360 Icon
  • RareDisease360 Icon
  • MyHero360 Icon
  • Optometry360 Icon
  • Ophthalmology360 Icon