Optometry 360
  • Home
  • Conferences
  • Videos
  • About Us
    • About Us – Mission
    • Media Partners
    • Advisory Board
    • Industry Council
    • Business Team

What are you looking for?

  • Conference Roundup
  • Contact Lenses
  • Diagnostics
  • Glaucoma
  • Myopia
  • Neurotrophic Keratitis
  • Ocular Surface Disease
  • Pediatrics
  • Practice Management
  • Presbyopia
  • Retina
  • Spotlight Series
The evolving role of the optometrist in nonsurgical cataract management
Optometry 360
  • Home
  • Conferences
  • Videos
  • About Us
    • About Us – Mission
    • Media Partners
    • Advisory Board
    • Industry Council
    • Business Team
Home > Phase 2b study highlights effectiveness of pilocarpine in treating presbyopia
  • Presbyopia

Phase 2b study highlights effectiveness of pilocarpine in treating presbyopia

Kelsey Moroz

A recent Phase 2b clinical trial demonstrated that 0.4% pilocarpine HCl (CSF-1), either alone or in combination with diclofenac sodium, significantly improves near vision in individuals with presbyopia.

The randomized, double-masked study included 166 adults aged 45-64 treated with either pilocarpine HCl alone, a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of pilocarpine HCl with diclofenac sodium, or diclofenac sodium only (control group).

By day 15, 43.1% of participants in the FDC group and 46.9% in the CSF-1 group achieved a ≥3-line improvement in mesopic, monocular, distance-corrected near visual acuity at 40 cm. In contrast, only 16.1% of the control group reached this milestone. Statistical significance was observed for both the FDC and pilocarpine-only groups compared to control (P = 0.0015 and P = 0.0002, respectively).

The trial also showed that 0.2% pilocarpine, used earlier in the study, had no significant benefit compared to the control. All formulations were well tolerated.

Reference
Farid M, Rowen SL, Moshirfar M, et al. Combination Low-Dose Pilocarpine/Diclofenac Sodium and Pilocarpine Alone for Presbyopia: Results of a Randomized Phase 2b Clinical Trial. Clin Ophthalmol. 2024;18:3425-3439. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S476658. PMID: 39606177; PMCID: PMC11600938.

Share

Related Content

  • Presbyopia

Smartphone reading habits differ between presbyopic and non-presbyopic adults

  • Presbyopia

Spotlight on TECNIS Odyssey™

  • Presbyopia

Drinking habit associated with faster progression of presbyopia in adults

  • Presbyopia

From readers to topical pharmaceuticals: a new dawn in presbyopia care

  • Presbyopia

Modeling and clinical data align on optimal pupil size for presbyopia therapy

  • Contact Lenses

Women in midlife show larger differences between preferred and full refractive correction

Share

Advisory Board

Kaleb Abbott, OD, MS, FAAO

Clark Chang, OD

Jessica Haynes, OD, FAAO, FORS, Dipl ABO

Monica Kalia, OD

Cecelia Koetting, OD, FAAO, DipABO

Roya Attar, OD, MBA, DHA, FAAO

Hardeep Kataria, OD, FAAO

Marc R. Bloomenstein, OD, FAAO

Elise Kramer, OD

See All
Optometry 360

Optometry 360® is a dynamic digital platform dedicated to advancing the field of eye care.

Get to Know Us

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Media Partners
  • Advertising Policy
  • Our Advisory Board

Sign up for our Newsletter

Sign up for our Newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
IHM Logo

© 2026 Optometry 360 is a trademark of International Healthcare Media, LLC. All rights Reserved

  • MedJournal360 Icon
  • RareDisease360 Icon
  • MyHero360 Icon
  • Optometry360 Icon
  • Ophthalmology360 Icon